| 4
November 2005
The
Thom Files
Following
on from yesterday's
post, Thom continues to rage at me, and demand I post my personal
details on a public forum:
Lets
have your address TEX. By the way are you
named text becauyse you have a one pint brain in a 10 gallon hat?
[...]
Lets
have your address TEX. Can you ever spell my name right you dung
heap? Speaking of lieing... well we don't have to we just read your
libalist blog.
[...]
fuckwit
give us your home address where you can be served or at
minimum "help the police with their inquiries". (I love that
old
phrase, its such BS! :-) )
As
for Thom's phantom law firm of "O'Lynne, Lyons and Fitzpatrick",
Thom now says he meant Golden, New Mexico, not Golden, Colorado:
I
also said I lived in Los Alamos NM too brain dead. Golden NM is
just oitside of Albuquerque.
Not
surprisingly, there is no sign of Thom's mystery law firm in the phone
directories for either New Mexico or Colorado.
And,
despite my requests to Thom, they haven't e-mailed me either. Still, Thom
is very confident in his non-existent dream team:
The
proceedure is that one contacts the blog and askes the offending
material and stolen photograph be removed. If they or you refuse then
and then only can one seek relief in a tribunal or court. But whats
this? Since your a coward you posted it overseas didn't you. That
complicates things abit but not much. if the blog refuses then we go
after the blog and have it removed totally.
[...]
they
will go after the blog, I'll do my part here. Care to meet me before
the communications tribunal?
[...]
So
your a coward I see, Afraid I actually will talk to your local
police chief? Or are you in an institution or something.
What
'communications tribunal'? Thom says they are at "55 King St. Melbourne".
Problem
is, 55 King St Melbourne is the address for the Victorian
Department of Justice, which doesn't have a "communications
tribunal".
So,
we have Thom threatening me with non-existent lawyers, non-existent police
'friends', non-existent tribunals and a photographer friend who doesn't
seem able to send me an e-mail. I asked him what 'libel' these scary non-existent
powers were going to punish me for:
calling
me a commie dusch bag.
A
female hygiene device for Germans?
Other
than his mighty spelling prowess, Thom also displays a great knowledge
of how the internet works:
are
you telling us you actually paid for a blog!
I
informed Thom as to the existence of something called "hosting fees".
Thom thinks I said 'posting' fees:
Posting
fees are for idiots who buy into that scam. And I was "On the web"
before there was an internet". [...] You are the last person on
the planet to lecture anyone about the net.
He
went on to treat me to another long, psychotically nutty non-sequitur
rant, this time about how Saddam was freely and fairly elected. No really:
What
a flaming moron you are? Have you even even been to a town over 60 people?
I hate wasting my time educating you but here goes. Iraq and all the
countries around it used the Arab system of voting.
Their society is made up of a step system... clans, families etc. A
family votes on a subject and then goes to the clan level where the
family votes. The clan then votes in the next step up in tribal confederations
with each tribe acting as a sort of mobile mini-state. In the absence
of a strong central authority, the tribal framework fulfilled the primary
functions of conflict and resource management. The most important tribal
confederations in Iraq included: the Muntafiq, Anaza, Dulaim, Shammar,
Zubayd, Ubayd, Bani Lam and Al-bu Muhammed.
This
is traditional arab voting and is much like the American electoral
college system. This is how the likes of Saddam came to power
and stayed in power. He secured the support of certain powerful clans
( The Dulaym, Jubbur, Ukaydat, Mulla, Sa'idat, and Shammar) and then
over threw the government the Brits left in 1968.
[...]
Saddam
is from the Tikrity Clan and the Al-bu Nasir tribe. It was one of the
first Iraqi clans to embrace the Pan Arab Ba'ath which Hitler started
in Syria to destabilize the British in WW2. This is where the term "Ba'ath
Socialist Party" comes from as in National Socialism. Neither of
course had anything to do with socialism.
When
the Brits left they left in place a nationalized oil company which Saddam
privatized. The Bush Oil interests tried to move in and grab
a chunk of it but Saddam threw them out of the country. Saddam
needed the stock in these new private company (stolen from the Iraqi
people) to divide among the clans that supported him. The clans used
the oil proceeds for the clan welfare system. This is part of the reasons
for the partisan activity in Iraq right now but Bush and Howard are
too stupid to understand why. Bush totally undermined the traditional
clan, tribe and family systems in Iraq. He not only diverted all the
oil money that was going to the supporting clans for clan welfare he
knocked out most of the infrastructure making life even worse. The Sunni
clans of the north west aren't taking this with a smile.
[...]
Now
any more uninformed remarks about voting in Iraq from
you? I'm sorry of you don't like the way Arab culture structures its
democratic systems but we have no right to go in and change it to something
we like. Bush didn't bring democracy to Iraq, he just imposed a system
that is easier to manipulate or to corrupt.
Got
that kiddies? Welcome to Thom Politics 101, where Saddam and Castro are
freely-elected democrats, where no plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11, where
supply and demand have no effect on prices, where Cuban dissidents are
Buddhist CIA agents, where Che Guevara 'never existed' and where George
Bush's grandfather was responsible for the rise of the Nazi party.
Oh,
one last thing, because Thom is so upset at my using his photo, I have
chosen an appropriate avatar:
Fat,
green and from another planet.
Looking
for older whackings?
Wanna
see my previous rants against lefty, commie, peacenick wankers, plus lots
of fun stuff about motorcycles, music and movies?................ Click
here for the full past whackings index
|
