|
Live
Whacking Permalink Archive
click "Live Whacking"
button for the latest entries
24-9-02
Fuck
Channel 10
 |
|
John
Edward locates his bowels
|
They've seen fit to
premiere Crossing Over - the horrid show of that "psychic"
fraud John Edward tonight. My favourite John Edward story is how he appeared
on TV the night of Sep.10, 2001, and - surprise, surprise - picked up
zero "vibes" about the event that would shake the world a few
hours away. Strangely (not really), none of the other great psychics picked
up anything either.
Sorry new agers, but
when I rule the world these fuckers will be the first against the wall.
We need to cleanse the gene pool of scum.
Fuck John Edward.
Fuck James Van Cunt (or whatever his name is). Fuck Uri "bullshit
is my life" Geller. Fuck Sylvia Browne. Fuck all you paranormalist
liars and tricksters. Fuck all you scum who give them money. Fuck all
you media dipshits who accept their lies for the sake of ratings. Fuck
the lawyers who represent them. Fuck all you alien abduction and crop-circle
dickheads. Fuck all you "repressed memory" liars. Fuck everyone
who prints their books and articles. Fuck all you stupid brain-dead cunts
who ever read Marlo Morgan's Mutant Message Down Under. Fuck all
you "subliminal messages in rock songs" assholes. Fuck the companies
who advertise during shows like Crossing Over. Fuck Deepak Chopra.
Fuck the Raelian Movement. And
last but not least, fuck Nostradamus.
If I've offended you,
blow me.
permalink
Grog-addled shambling commie reveals Dubya's secret linguistic terror
Whisky-drenched
leftie mumbler Bob Ellis writes another
tortured column in today's Sydney Morning Herald (where else?). It's
the latest incarnation of his formulaic america-is-evil spiel, where brave,
correct-thinking dissidents fight the democratic tyranny of America.
In my ever-lengthening
anthology of American euphemisms for violence - incursion, engagement,
relocation, insurgency, counter-insurgency, terminate with extreme prejudice,
friendly fire, detention, pre-emption, pacification, peace-keeping -
"regime change" is perhaps the subtlest.
Funny, I thought it
meant what it said. You know: change the regime
Round Iraq this
means the slaughter of 100,000 people, a war with Kurds from Iran and
Turkey, burning oil wells all over the Arabian peninsula and a chemical
attack on Jerusalem or Tel Aviv. "Regime change" suggests
a milder, gentler process than that.
Well, only if you're
very stupid.
But at least
it has some distant relation to what it means: a process, however understated,
of getting Saddam out. Other American phrases are more frightening.
Odd how the anti-USA
crowd are obessed with america's language. Some might wonder if it would
be worth spending time examining Castro's tyranny, or how the North Koreans
are busy murdering their population, but what would they know?
When George Bush
says, for instance, "I'm a patient man", he means, or it seems
this week he means, "I'm an impatient man". When he says,
"We must be strong, and secure the peace", he means - or I
think he means - we must, whatever others tell us, now go to war.
Be patient folks,
he's going to make his point soon I'm sure.
When he says,
"What they hate us for is our freedom", he means they hate
our Hollywood-hamburger-Playboy Bunny culture and we think they should
be free to adopt it, if need be by force.
They hate hollywood
& hamburgers do they? Funny how everyone around the world can't seem
to get enough of them. Then their own lefties - seeing their dreams of
Stalinist utopia evaporate under the weight of freedom of choice - whinge
about American cultural invasions. So answer me this, GrogBob, give me
one example of where a society has been forced to buy hamburgers
and hollywood movies.
When he says,
"Our quarrel is not with the Iraqi people", he means - or
I think he means - we're going to bomb them to hell, real soon.
Well, actually dummy,
he means he wants to get rid of Hussein and his psychotic, murderous junta.
A bunch of guys - by the way - you never seem to write many articles about.
Funny how your concern for evil governments only seems to apply to the
world's most powerful democracy.
Words are what,
among the great apes, make us the smartest. We must be careful not to
use them in suicidal, genocidal or fratricidal ways. Words are either
our friends or our destroyers; they cannot be fair-weather friends,
they are one or the other.
Breathless linguistic
philosophy. What a mighty contribution to the current geopolitical debate.
So if Saddam
should be killed and the Middle East Balkanised and his oil grabbed
by the US because they will manage it more benevolently than he does,
we should probably say this. Plain language always helps, and euphemisms
are hardly ever believed.
GrogBob is in a terminal
state of confusion here - "euphemisms are hardly ever believed",
yet he spends a whole article here waffling about the oh-so-sinister doublespeak
about the satanic Uncle Sam. Well, which is it, you fuckwit?
And here's the required
here's-where-Bob-goes-completely-bonkers paragraph.......
To say we're
after him because he has "weapons of mass destruction" (like
Israel) and "murders his own people" (like Israel, whose Palestinians
parallel his Kurds) and "uses chemical weapons" (like the
US napalming the naked little girl in Vietnam) and he's a "barbaric
dictator" (like Marcos, Pinochet, Yeltsin, Noriega, Batista, Nasser,
Stalin and other former friends of the US; and Adolf Hitler whose rise
George Bush's grandfather funded), flaws can arise in one's argument
and one can look a fool.
Talk about the brink
of insanity. Well, let's take GrogBob's points one-by-one
.
Weapons of mass
destruction ("like Israel!!") - yes, and which of these
countries has actually used their WMDs at every opportunity, hmmm? I guess
to the idiot moral-equivalency-left, such things are irrelevant.
"murders his
own people" (like Israel, whose Palestinians parallel his Kurds)
- yep, you read it right. Bob (who - incidentally - never met a communist
thug he felt worthy of criticism) is equating the only democratic country
in the middle east to a psychotic, genocidal dictator. And as for the
palestintians being in the same position as the Kurds in Iraq, well, I
don't recall the kurds being able to vote or receving access to jewish-funded
healthcare. Then again, comparisons are not GrogBob's strongpoint.
"uses chemical
weapons" (like the US napalming the naked little girl in Vietnam)
- Nice comparison, except, a) it was thirty years ago, b) it was widely
condemned everywhere, including inside the evil USA where people have
a democratic right to protest, c) it was a result of a heavy-handed strategy
to win a stupid war, whereas Iraq does this to thousands of people just
for fun.
The naughty dictators
& friends of USA list. Lessee
..
Marcos - who was overthrown in a peaceful
coup the USA applauded
Pinochet - yes, an evil bastard who the USA
should never have supported. Though this would actually tend to undermine
your point GrogBob - wouldn't this give the USA a greater obligation to
remove Hussein and rid the world of one more evil dictator? Make your
mind up dickhead: should the USA act against tyrants or not? The truth
is, you and the idiot anti-USA left will condemn them no matter what course
of action they take.
Yeltsin - ..er
um
what? He's was
a democratically elected Russian President. I guess Bob is upset the Russians
lost the Cold War and Yeltsin is the sinister poster-boy for evil democracy
and economic reform. Lefty romanticists love playing principles with other
people's lives.
Noriega - overthrown by the USA. So Bob -
did they do the right thing here or not?
Batista - yes, another worthless prick. Then
again, he was pretty small beer compared to the politically correct nutcase
who replaced him (yet another humanitarian hero Bob never writes critiques
about. Funny that. One might think Bob has an agenda other than concern
for human lives)
Nasser - yes, another naughty man. So I ask
again: do you want the USA to act against them or not?
Stalin - Stalin?????? The guy the Americans
spent duelling with during the cold war?
and Adolf Hitler whose rise George Bush's grandfather
funded - *blink*. You read it here first folks - GrogBob says Hitler
was an American ally.
Only in the FairFax
press could this wino get space to write this deranged screed.
The American
Republican Right really hate plain words. This is why they say "liberating
Iraq" when they mean seizing its oil and making a lot of money.
Except the cost of
war might kinda outweigh any oil benefits, not to mention that the USA
doesn't exactly depend on Iraqi oil.
This is why they
now say "George Bush is a man of peace" when they mean he'll
go to war at the drop of a hat for no good reason
Yeah, like all those
unprovoked wars he's launched against
um
..
And when they
say "regime change" they mean, or could mean, "Armageddon".
Or it could be you
need to lay off the LSD for a while.
It would be nice
to get words back where they should be, in bed, as it were, with their
meanings, and I'm sure we'll get them there some day. I'm a patient
man. And I believe that justice, will prevail; maybe after a regime
change in Washington to a ruler who knows what words mean.
Bob votes for Chairman
Mao. He's non-capitalist, non-American, and has a healthy regard for the
extermination of politically incorrect thinkers.
permalink
|