The Dog's Tits
Little Tiny Wit
Sasha Castel
Tim Blair
James Morrow
USS Clueless
Damian Penny
Gareth Parker
James Randi
Little Green Footballs
Bovination
Some Bloody Wog
Rachel Lucas

Premium core
Paul Wright
Jane Galt
Kathy Kinsley
Bizzare Science
Silent Running
Jason Soon
Samizdata
Eject Eject Eject!!!
Daniel Pipes
Alex Robson
Scott of The Eye

Beautifully Wicked
Bitchin' Monaro Guide
Drivel Warehouse
Little Tiny Lies
Sup
port Israel
Capitalist Chicks
Evil Godless Swine
Professor Bunyip
The Rottweiler
Right Wing News
Clubbeaux
Spleenville
Bleedin' Brain

Anti-suckage
Le Québécois Libre
Hot Buttered Death
Vodkapundit
Vigilant TV
Pejman

Aussies Up Your Arse
Bargarz
Angry Anderson
After Grog Blog
Ken Parish
Brain Graze
Amax Weblog

Dickheads Galore
Dick Neville
aus.politics
The Mirror
George Monbiot
Jew Killers United
Pilger
I Love Osama
The Guardian
Screeching Dweebs
Noam Chomsky
John Gotti Fanzine
Green Left Weekly
The Independent

 

Live Whacking Permalink Archive
click "Live Whacking" button for the latest entries


16-1-03

More on the stupid "war-on-drugs"

News Corp. boofhead Piers Akerman is one of the many reasons I'd never call myself a conservative. In today's bizarro, rambling column, he starts off talking about Cheryl Kernot, then jumps to worldwide drug-legalisation conspiracies, and how just so darned evil is any thought of legalising drugs. As usual with anti-drugs moralist waffle, he can give no good reason why hard drugs should be not legalised.

The Daily Telegraph has long had it's head up its arse about the drugs issue, particularly under the editorship of Murdoch lickspittle Col Allan (who has since moved on - fittingly - to look after The John Gotti Fanzine), who - during the debate over the ACT's heroin trial - actually admitted he'd rather see kids dead than on drugs.

Aside from the moralist hyprocrisy of distinguishing between "good" legal drugs (booze, cigarettes), and nasty "bad" ones, and the whole libertarian argument of "it's my body, so mind your own business, asswipe", here are the cold hard facts on drug prohibition;

1- Prohibiting drugs cannot, does not, and never has reduced (let alone stopped) the usage and trafficking of narcotics. All the "get tough" policies, periodical "crackdowns", draconian jail terms and monumentally stupid american "Drug Czars" will never change this.

2- Prohibiting drugs causes people to consume them in varying, uncertain, dangerous dosage levels. It spreads disease and people die as a result of taking a bad dose away from medical help.

3- Drug prohibition massively increases crime rates: addicts commit crimes to pay for the street value of a product which could be sold cheaply. The income from illicit sales provides a massive stream of revenue for street gangs and drug cartels. Entire networks of criminals exist because of the prohibition on drugs. The prohibition on narcotics has been the greatest boost to organised crime in history.

4- Massive amount of publicly funded resources are required in the attempt to solve these problems, and yet every single one of these problems has gotten worse. We are all, in effect, paying lots of our tax money to create more crime and more health problems.

And you know what? Every single one of these problems would be improved by the legalisation of drugs.

- let pharmaceutical companies bid to produce safe, approved, consistent-dosage "hits" of heroin, coke and the rest
- let addicts shoot up the safe dosage in a clean facility under the watch of medical staff

The effects?

- huge reduction in fatal OD's.
- regular, consistent "hits" allow addicts to place some control back over their lives. No need to break in to a house and steal the CD player, no need to sell one's body. Simply the knowledge that they'll be able to get their hit, do it safely, and get help if they need it.
- a huge reduction in drug-related crime due to an easily affordable safe, regular and legal product.
- drug gangs and cartels face a drastic loss in revenue.
- police can actually go back to doing something useful, like catching murderers.
- prison space can be made available for - you know - actual criminals.
- less strain on the health system.

You're seeing the picture here: drug prohibition makes everything worse, legalisation makes everything better.

Don't expect any politicians to take up this line soon though. Logic has no more place in drug policy than it did in witch burnings.

I mean less dead kids...less crime...more effective policing and health services. What exactly is the problem here?


Tex in Sydney

Yo Sydney bloggers: I've got a free day in Sydney on Sunday 26th Jan. If you wish to join me in consumption of liquids/foodstuffs, let me know.

 

Motorcycles
MC News
AMA Superbikes
Motorcycle News
Perth Bikes
Bon Trikes
Oz Trikes
Allmoto
MotoGP

Women
Holly Valance
Eliza Dushku
Katherine Heigl
Michelle Williams
Kate Winslet
Kristin Kreuk

Kulcha
Dark Horizons
CHUD
Roger Ebert
Urban Cinephile
RAGE

Info'mation
FrontPage Mag
Snopes
The Smoking Gun
Straight Dope
Against Nature
Australian Skeptics
CSICOP
IPA

Assorted Gubshite
Draggin Jeans
Really Cute Chess Geek
Miniguns
Pure rancour
Brunching Shuttlecocks
The Onion
killfrog.com
Omega Chess
Barrett Rifles

Brews
Coopers Ale

Subzero
Cougar
Hahn Ice
Strongbow
Carlsberg
Crown Lager
Carlton Draught
Tooheys New